顯示具有 Cancer 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章
顯示具有 Cancer 標籤的文章。 顯示所有文章

2011年7月25日 星期一

Menopause Hormone Therapy and Breast Cancer Concealed

Supreme Court Says Wyeth Must Pay $60 Million Prempro Verdict

Wyeth failed to conduct appropriate studies on breast cancer and concealed material facts about its products' safety (p. 35)

- The warnings provided by Wyeth were misleading and “reassuring.” (p. 39)

- Internal Wyeth documents showed that Wyeth responded to studies suggesting a possible breast cancer risk by downplaying the risk through public relations campaigns and its sales representatives' interactions with physicians. pg. 8

-? Wyeth engaged in extensive ghost-writing of scientific articles in order to influence prescribing physicians.? Published under independent doctors' names, at least 51 ghostwritten medical articles touted the benefits of hormone replacement therapy while minimizing the breast cancer risk. (p. 11)

- Wyeth implemented a policy to dismiss scientific studies that showed any link between breast cancer and hormone therapy drugs and to distract the public and medical professionals from the information. (p. 40)

-? Substantial evidence was introduced that Wyeth acted with malice, conduct that supports a punitive damage award. (p. 41)

Dedicated to all the women who have died of breast cancer and to those who have fought cancer and those who unknowingly trusted their doctors menopause treatment suggestions and were told HRT was safe. Now we know good doctors were lied to by pharmaceutical companies like Wyeth.

Source: Nevada Supreme Court????? http://www.nevadajudiciary.us/index.php/oralarguments/720-wyeth-vs-rowatt

Bookmark and ShareCategory: Menopause Relief, Hot Flashes, Night Sweats | Tags: best herbs for menopause, best natural menopause remedies, breast cancer awareness, breast cancer health tips, Chinese herbs for menopause, herbal HRT, HRT Hormone Replacement Therapy, menopause treatment, natural menopause relief Comment ?

2011年7月10日 星期日

FDA to Hear Appeal on Breast Cancer Drug (HealthDay)

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter by Amanda Gardner
healthday Reporter – Tue?Jun?28, 11:48?pm?ET

TUESDAY, June 28 (HealthDay News) -- The controversial cancer drug Avastin becomes the focus of U.S. regulators' attention again Tuesday during a two-day hearing to determine if the medication can keep its FDA approval for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Back on Dec. 16, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommended revoking approval of the drug to fight breast cancer, citing the medication's poor performance in follow-up studies and its potential for serious side effects.

The drug's maker, Genentech, now owned by the pharmaceutical giant Roche, was given the chance to appeal the FDA recommendation and present additional evidence. That appeal will be the focus of the hearing and, according to published reports, will involve Genentech urging one more clinical trial before any government action on the drug.

The FDA's unusual step of scheduling another hearing on the drug underscores the difficulty of withdrawing approval of a cancer medication, the Associated Press reported.

"It says to me that either they [the FDA] have gotten a great deal of negative feedback from various quarters, or there's some kind of internal disagreement within the agency," Dr. Gary Lyman, professor at the Duke Cancer Institute in North Carolina, told the news service. Lyman was part of the FDA advisory panel that voted 12-1 last July to revoke Avastin's approval as a breast cancer therapy.

The FDA's December recommendation did not immediately affect breast cancer patients' access to the drug or limit use of Avastin (bevacizumab) for advanced colon, lung, kidney and brain cancer.

"FDA has taken the first step to removing the breast cancer indication from the label of the cancer drug Avastin," Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, announced at the Dec. 16 news conference. "This is a first step in a process and will not have an immediate impact on use of Avastin or the drug's availability."

"Oncologists currently treating patients with Avastin should use medical judgment in deciding whether to continue treatment or explore other treatment options," she added.

Some doctors expressed concern at the FDA's decision last December.

"This is a tough issue. There are women who have clearly responded to the treatment, [and] this is going to be a very difficult pill to swallow for those women," said Dr. Neil Spector, professor of medicine at the Duke Cancer Institute.

"There's a very real possibility that there may be a subgroup of women that are likely to respond to this," Spector said. "I don't think this will be the end from the standpoint of investigation and people trying to understand who that subpopulation is. It's just unfortunate that this will put a huge crimp in trying to figure that out."

Another expert, Dr. Julie Gralow, director of breast medical oncology at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA), called the FDA decision "disappointing."

"It is clear that some breast cancer patients derive substantial benefit from Avastin," Gralow, who is also professor in the Medical Oncology Division of the University of Washington School of Medicine, said in a SCAA press statement. "We don't know how to select those tumors or patients yet. It is looking like patient factors, not tumor factors, might be the best way to select those who benefit. To withhold this drug from all patients because some don't benefit is incorrect."

Doctors can continue to prescribe Avastin to patients "off-label," as they do other drugs. But it's unlikely that insurance companies would cover off-label use of the drug given its high price tag, Spector said. Avastin costs more than $8,000 a month, according to published reports.

The FDA last December did not rule out the possibility that if Avastin is actually revoked, approval could be restored for certain subgroups of patients who may benefit.

"FDA is ready to work with Genentech on any proposals to conduct additional studies in metastatic breast cancer designed to identify responsive tumors," Woodcock added at the time.

Avastin was OK'd in 2008 for use in conjunction with chemotherapy under the FDA's accelerated approval program. Approval was based on one clinical trial of patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer that found a benefit in terms of cancer recurrence -- but not overall survival -- and was contingent on further data to confirm the results.

Three subsequent studies failed to find an overall survival benefit and, in fact, showed less impressive improvements in survival involving no progression of cancer.

After reviewing all four studies, FDA concluded that "patients receiving Avastin did not live any longer than patients not treated with the drug and were at greater risk of severe side effects, some of which are unique to Avastin," Woodcock said.

"These include perforations of the nose, stomach and intestine, many of which can be life-threatening, as well as high blood pressure, heart attack or heart failure, wound-healing complications and organ damage or failure," she said.

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more on Avastin.

2011年7月9日 星期六

FDA Panel Rejects Avastin for Breast Cancer (HealthDay)

WEDNESDAY, June 29 (HealthDay News) -- The blockbuster cancer drug Avastin got soundly rejected late Wednesday as a treatment for metastatic breast cancer by a U.S. health advisory panel that found the medication was not effective and causes dangerous side effects.

By unanimous vote, the panelists rejected the drug maker's appeal of a U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommendation last December to revoke Avastin's approval for breast cancer. The FDA recommendation cited the medication's poor performance in follow-up studies and its potential for serious side effects.

The drug maker, Genentech, now owned by pharmaceutical giant Roche, was given an unusual two-day hearing this week before the six-member advisory group.

Tuesday's opening-day hearing was dominated by patients and physicians who argued, often emotionally, against the drug's revocation.

"For the patients and their supporters, it was the reality that many of them were alive and well with few symptoms, which they and their physicians attributed to the fact that Avastin had a significant treatment benefit for their breast cancer," blogged Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, Deputy Chief Medical Officer for the American Cancer Society, who attended the hearing.

But later in the day, he added, "the FDA told a different story. The data from clinical trials, after looking at thousands of patients treated with Avastin in addition to more standard chemotherapy, showed no meaningful clinical benefit. At one point, an FDA representative said that they were looking for only one trial that had some sort of benefit .. No such trial emerged, while the side effect risk was considerable."

On Wednesday, according to CNN, Dr. Sandra Horning, one of Genentech's top scientists, cited a February 2008 memo in which the head of the FDA's cancer drugs division made positive comments about the study that he had criticized on Tuesday. Genentech officials also defended E2100, the original study that formed the basis for the FDA's accelerated approval, and said there were no better treatments available for many women, CNN reported.

Lichtenfeld, at the end of the first day of hearings, outlined the dilemma. "Clearly, we are in a place where emotion meets science and the FDA's decision will prove to be a difficult one," he said in his blog.

The advisory panel's vote is non-binding, and FDA commissioner Margaret Hamburg will make a final ruling, the Associated Press reported.

The FDA's unusual step of scheduling another hearing on the drug underscored the difficulty of withdrawing approval of a cancer medication, the AP reported.

"It says to me that either they [the FDA] have gotten a great deal of negative feedback from various quarters, or there's some kind of internal disagreement within the agency," Dr. Gary Lyman, professor at the Duke Cancer Institute in North Carolina, told the news service. Lyman was part of the FDA advisory panel that voted 12-1 last year to revoke Avastin's approval as a breast cancer therapy.

The FDA's December recommendation did not immediately affect breast cancer patients' access to the drug or limit use of Avastin (bevacizumab) for advanced colon, lung, kidney and brain cancer.

Doctors can continue to prescribe Avastin to patients "off-label," as they do other drugs. But it's unlikely that insurance companies would cover off-label use of the drug given its high price tag. Avastin costs more than $8,000 a month, according to published reports.

Avastin was OK'd in 2008 for use in metastatic breast cancer in conjunction with chemotherapy under the FDA's accelerated approval program. Approval was based on a clinical trial of patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer that found a benefit in terms of cancer recurrence -- but not overall survival -- and was contingent on further data to confirm the results.

Three subsequent studies failed to find an overall survival benefit and showed less impressive improvements in survival involving no progression of cancer.

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more on Avastin.

2011年7月7日 星期四

FDA to Hear Appeal on Breast Cancer Drug (HealthDay)

TUESDAY, June 28 (HealthDay News) -- The controversial cancer drug Avastin becomes the focus of U.S. regulators' attention again Tuesday during a two-day hearing to determine if the medication can keep its FDA approval for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer.

Back on Dec. 16, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration recommended revoking approval of the drug to fight breast cancer, citing the medication's poor performance in follow-up studies and its potential for serious side effects.

The drug's maker, Genentech, now owned by the pharmaceutical giant Roche, was given the chance to appeal the FDA recommendation and present additional evidence. That appeal will be the focus of the hearing and, according to published reports, will involve Genentech urging one more clinical trial before any government action on the drug.

The FDA's unusual step of scheduling another hearing on the drug underscores the difficulty of withdrawing approval of a cancer medication, the Associated Press reported.

"It says to me that either they [the FDA] have gotten a great deal of negative feedback from various quarters, or there's some kind of internal disagreement within the agency," Dr. Gary Lyman, professor at the Duke Cancer Institute in North Carolina, told the news service. Lyman was part of the FDA advisory panel that voted 12-1 last July to revoke Avastin's approval as a breast cancer therapy.

The FDA's December recommendation did not immediately affect breast cancer patients' access to the drug or limit use of Avastin (bevacizumab) for advanced colon, lung, kidney and brain cancer.

"FDA has taken the first step to removing the breast cancer indication from the label of the cancer drug Avastin," Dr. Janet Woodcock, director of the FDA's Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, announced at the Dec. 16 news conference. "This is a first step in a process and will not have an immediate impact on use of Avastin or the drug's availability."

"Oncologists currently treating patients with Avastin should use medical judgment in deciding whether to continue treatment or explore other treatment options," she added.

Some doctors expressed concern at the FDA's decision last December.

"This is a tough issue. There are women who have clearly responded to the treatment, [and] this is going to be a very difficult pill to swallow for those women," said Dr. Neil Spector, professor of medicine at the Duke Cancer Institute.

"There's a very real possibility that there may be a subgroup of women that are likely to respond to this," Spector said. "I don't think this will be the end from the standpoint of investigation and people trying to understand who that subpopulation is. It's just unfortunate that this will put a huge crimp in trying to figure that out."

Another expert, Dr. Julie Gralow, director of breast medical oncology at the Seattle Cancer Care Alliance (SCCA), called the FDA decision "disappointing."

"It is clear that some breast cancer patients derive substantial benefit from Avastin," Gralow, who is also professor in the Medical Oncology Division of the University of Washington School of Medicine, said in a SCAA press statement. "We don't know how to select those tumors or patients yet. It is looking like patient factors, not tumor factors, might be the best way to select those who benefit. To withhold this drug from all patients because some don't benefit is incorrect."

Doctors can continue to prescribe Avastin to patients "off-label," as they do other drugs. But it's unlikely that insurance companies would cover off-label use of the drug given its high price tag, Spector said. Avastin costs more than $8,000 a month, according to published reports.

The FDA last December did not rule out the possibility that if Avastin is actually revoked, approval could be restored for certain subgroups of patients who may benefit.

"FDA is ready to work with Genentech on any proposals to conduct additional studies in metastatic breast cancer designed to identify responsive tumors," Woodcock added at the time.

Avastin was OK'd in 2008 for use in conjunction with chemotherapy under the FDA's accelerated approval program. Approval was based on one clinical trial of patients with metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer that found a benefit in terms of cancer recurrence -- but not overall survival -- and was contingent on further data to confirm the results.

Three subsequent studies failed to find an overall survival benefit and, in fact, showed less impressive improvements in survival involving no progression of cancer.

After reviewing all four studies, FDA concluded that "patients receiving Avastin did not live any longer than patients not treated with the drug and were at greater risk of severe side effects, some of which are unique to Avastin," Woodcock said.

"These include perforations of the nose, stomach and intestine, many of which can be life-threatening, as well as high blood pressure, heart attack or heart failure, wound-healing complications and organ damage or failure," she said.

More information

The U.S. National Cancer Institute has more on Avastin.